source at bottom Horizontal information seeking A form of skimming activity, where people view just one or two pages
from an academic site and then `bounce’ out, perhaps never to return.
The figures are instructive: Navigation Squirreling behaviour Diverse information seekers Checking information seekers QUOTE FROM:
Information behavior of the researcher of the future Conducted for the British Library and JISC , this report focuses on information seeking behavior of students born
after 1993 (the Google Generation). Listen to presentation given and Q&A's when the paper was released on January 16, 2008. photo: ardanea@morguefile The information literacy of young people, has not • internet research shows that the speed of young • young people have a poor understanding of their • as a result, they exhibit a strong preference for • faced with a long list of search hits, young people • young people have unsophisticated mental maps of • as a result, the search engine, be that Yahoo or • many young people do not find library-sponsored
21C. BEHAVIOURS: horizontal, bouncing, checking and viewing
"Users are promiscuous, diverse and volatile."
around 60 per cent of e-journal users view no more than three pages and a majority (up to 65 per cent) never return.
People in virtual libraries spend a lot of time simply
finding their way around: in fact they spend as much time
finding their bearings as actually viewing what they find.
Viewers
The average times that users spend on e-book and e-
journal sites are very short: typically four and eight
minutes respectively. It is clear that users are not reading
online in the traditional sense, indeed there are signs that
new forms of `reading’ are emerging as users `power
browse’ horizontally through titles, contents pages and
abstracts going for quick wins. It almost seems that they
go online to avoid reading in the traditional sense.
Academic users have strong consumer instincts and
research shows that they will squirrel away content in the
form of downloads, especially when there are free offers.
In spite of this behaviour and the very short session
times that we witness, there is no evidence as to the
extent to which these downloads are actually read.
Log analysis reveals that user behaviour is very diverse:
geographical location, gender, type of university and
status are all powerful consumer demographics. One
size does not fit all.
Users assess authority and trust for themselves in a
matter of seconds by dipping and cross-checking across
different sites and by relying on favoured brands (e.g.
Google).
improved with the widening access to technology:
in fact, their apparent facility with computers
disguises some worrying problems
people’s web searching means that little time is
spent in evaluating information, either for
relevance, accuracy or authority
information needs and thus find it difficult to
develop effective search strategies
expressing themselves in natural language rather
than analysing which key words might be more
effective
find it difficult to assess the relevance of the
materials presented and often print off pages with
no more than a perfunctory glance at them
These points relate both to the current use of the
internet by young people and, a technology
generation earlier, to their use of early online systems
and CDROMs. There is little direct evidence that
young people’s information literacy is any better or
worse than before. However, the ubiquitous use of
highly branded search engines raises other issues
what the internet is, often failing to appreciate that
it is a collection of networked resources from
different providers
Google, becomes the primary brand that they
associate with the internet
resources intuitive and therefore prefer to use
Google or Yahoo instead: these offer a familiar, if
simplistic solution, for their study needs
Comments